<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detecting Hidden Text</title>
	<link>http://www.clicksentry.com/blog/2005/detecting-hidden-text/</link>
	<description>ClickSentry SEO, Link Building, Marketing and Super Duper Blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: stadevra</title>
		<link>http://www.clicksentry.com/blog/2005/detecting-hidden-text/#comment-23310</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.clicksentry.com/blog/2005/detecting-hidden-text/#comment-23310</guid>
					<description>&quot;With the introduction of the rel=”nofollow” attribute and the success of the coop network (in size), more and more people like Jamesisko will be trying to “pull one over.” Our link manager software does a number of things very well, and I think that detecting “black hat” techniques like hidden text is one that it should be able to tackle. I am going to put some pen to paper on this to see just how difficult and resource intensive it will be. We already are beta testing the rel=”nofollow” addition to the CS link manager, but I think that detecting any tom foolery inside containing divs would be an even better addition. More to come.&quot;
What I can not believe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With the introduction of the rel=”nofollow” attribute and the success of the coop network (in size), more and more people like Jamesisko will be trying to “pull one over.” Our link manager software does a number of things very well, and I think that detecting “black hat” techniques like hidden text is one that it should be able to tackle. I am going to put some pen to paper on this to see just how difficult and resource intensive it will be. We already are beta testing the rel=”nofollow” addition to the CS link manager, but I think that detecting any tom foolery inside containing divs would be an even better addition. More to come.&#8221;<br />
What I can not believe!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

