<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trust and Linking</title>
	<link>http://www.clicksentry.com/blog/2004/trust-and-linking/</link>
	<description>ClickSentry SEO, Link Building, Marketing and Super Duper Blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: FireTown</title>
		<link>http://www.clicksentry.com/blog/2004/trust-and-linking/#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.clicksentry.com/blog/2004/trust-and-linking/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>I remember the old days when you felt like you knew the people you are networking with. Now everyone has caught on. I started seo in 1999. Is funny to see how now people talk about link exchange like it's the hot new thing.

What is bad is when new seo's try to be slick. Very often old seo's will take advantage of that attitude and abuse it with their fake link directories.

I've met some real dipshits online but they normally get what they deserve...absolutely nothing.

my new rule is, if a site is quality, the webmaster is most likely a serious standup person.

All the focus on PR and so on means nothing if they give you a lot of hassle about placing you on actually a page with some PR and it is not worth the headache.

What goes around comes around ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the old days when you felt like you knew the people you are networking with. Now everyone has caught on. I started seo in 1999. Is funny to see how now people talk about link exchange like it&#8217;s the hot new thing.</p>
<p>What is bad is when new seo&#8217;s try to be slick. Very often old seo&#8217;s will take advantage of that attitude and abuse it with their fake link directories.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve met some real dipshits online but they normally get what they deserve&#8230;absolutely nothing.</p>
<p>my new rule is, if a site is quality, the webmaster is most likely a serious standup person.</p>
<p>All the focus on PR and so on means nothing if they give you a lot of hassle about placing you on actually a page with some PR and it is not worth the headache.</p>
<p>What goes around comes around &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
